Contact: Jason Mercier, Budget Research Analyst
(360) 956-3482
It's only our money
By Jason Mercier, Evergreen Freedom Foundation
It's official. Even though the state is facing a built-in deficit of well
over a billion dollars in the coming biennium, the mounting list of state
audits proves state officials have some serious housecleaning to do before
they even think of raising taxes.
A recent hearing summarizing the legislative audit of the Developmental
Disabilities Division (DDD) in the Department of Social and Health Services,
convinced me more than ever that increasing taxes is not an option.
That is, of course, unless it is ok to dump more hard-earned tax dollars
into a system devoid of accountability.
In one of DDD's many programs, JLARC determined that 32 percent of its
clients were ineligible for services. During the three-month period of the
audit, these ineligible individuals had received more than "$1.8 million
in paid services, or 53 percent of the money expended on the 9,106 individuals
in this client category."
Furthermore, of the 31,759 total individuals JLARC reviewed in various
DDD programs, "approximately 2,300 had obviously made up' Social
Security Numbers"2,055 being 123-456-789.
You might assume these abuses have consequences. And perhaps they would
if Governor Locke would stop making himself an obstacle to independent and
comprehensive performance audits of state programs. The legislature did
authorize JLARC to conduct a comprehensive performance audit of DDD, but
when signing the 2002 supplemental budget, Governor Locke vetoed the committee's
second-year funding increase for this biennium. By eliminating the $212,000
increase, how much more revenue did the governor ultimately cost the state?
Without this increase, JLARC effectively is forced to scale down the performance
audit.
Why does our governor seem to fear accountability? He talks the good talk,
but he has repeatedly vetoed independent and comprehensive performance audits
this biennium. In addition to pushing through an irresponsible supplemental
budget that ensures a huge deficit, the governor continues to prohibit the
state auditor from doing the job citizens hired him to do.
In the Washington
State Auditor's Office 2001 Annual Report, State Auditor Brian Sonntag
addresses the need for performance reviews: "Currently, there is no
overall, comprehensive review of whether state government is meeting performance
goals or measures designed to ensure programs are efficient and effective.
And, although it's been asked for decades, no one has stepped forward to
answer the question: What core services should government provide
and how can it do so in the most effective and efficient way?'"
In fact, before any case can be made for a need to increase taxes, citizens
must have no doubt that their current tax dollars are being spent efficiently
and effectively. To that end, the state auditor recommends "expand[ing]
the state's use of performance audits." He believes, "The program
should authorize a full range of performance audits, including economy and
efficiency audits and program audits, as well as performance verifications.
It must be an independent, comprehensive program that evaluates on a regular
basis whether state government programs and services are operating efficiently
and are achieving desired results."
Remember the $1.8 million paid out in services to the ineligible clients
in DDD? At the end of the day, it is ultimately our problemwe taxpayers.
This is because state officials are not truly held accountable for wasting
our tax dollars. So the problem will only exacerbate, and we will eventually
feel it in our wallets.
Frankly, we do bear some responsibility. If we don't want to have our taxes
wasted and potentially increased, it is our responsibility to step up to
the plate and demand action be taken. Unless our elected officials feel
the heat from us, what is their incentive for addressing these outrages?
That said, maybe it's time for a new battle cry. In addition to "no
taxation without representation," we should proclaim "no taxation
without performance audits." And not just any performance audits, but
those that are truly independent and comprehensive.
After all, it is our money we're talking about. Let's ensure some real
accountability for it.
Jason Mercier is a Budget Research Analyst for the Olympia-based Evergreen
Freedom Foundation. He can be reached at (360) 956-3482 or jmercier@effwa.org.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"