Contact: Marsha Richards, Communications Director
(360) 956-3482
Union presides over kangaroo court
By Ken Eikenberry I went to the Federal Way headquarters of the Washington Education
Association in May of this year to attend an impartial hearing on behalf
of a teacher who was challenging her union. Frankly, having visited the
old Soviet Union as a guest of the Procurator General, I believe their administrative
hearings were more fair than the WEA process.
When I arrived at the union's headquarters, WEA officials informed me I
would have to sign an agreement not to speak or write about anything I observed
at the hearing . . . or leave immediately. I left. But I soon learned what
the union is trying to hide.
The purpose of the WEA's so-called "impartial" arbitration hearing
is to determine what portion of mandatory union fees paid by nonmembers
is being used for representation purposes, as distinguished from the portion
being used for political or ideological purposes. By "union,"
I mean the state, national, regional and local affiliates of the WEA. Together,
these four groups collect more than $50 million each year from 74,000 public
school employees in Washington state.
Individual teachers have about $733 taken from their paychecks for the
union each year, and the WEA admits at least 24 percent of that (and 43
percent on the national level) is spent on activities not related to collective
bargaining, contracts or grievances. This year, 281 teachers from around
our state challenged the union's calculation, saying that percentage is
much higher and a good part is spent on political causes they do not support.
The 281 teachers challenging the union are among some 3,900 statewide who
have refused to join the union. These teachers are still required to pay
mandatory fees equal to regular dues, but they cannot vote on their own
contracts or run for union office, and the union withholds their legal liability
insurance. Fortunately, a 1986 U.S. Supreme Court decision entitles these
teachers to a refund of dues spent by the union on political and ideological
activities.
At issue in this year's WEA arbitration hearing was just how much of the
union's revenue goes into political action and other activity that, by court
rulings, should not be charged to non-members. As a former state attorney
general, I was astounded by the one-sidedness of the WEA's arbitration process.
The hearing was held during school hours on a weekday when most teachers,
presumably, could not attend. A battery of attorneys was on hand for the
union to counter any claims a teacher might make.
The arbitrator was hired by the WEA with no input from the other side.
The court reporter present was also hired by the WEA. This year the Evergreen
Freedom Foundation, a free-market organization that has long been involved
in helping teachers hold their union accountable, attempted to bring its
own court reporter because of difficulties getting access to the transcript
at last year's hearing. EFF's court reporter was not allowed into the hearing,
despite the arbitration's own rules saying all parties are permitted to
have one.
Teachers challenging the WEA are not permitted to see any of the union's
evidence before the hearing. As proof of their 24 percent calculation, WEA
attorneys submitted twelve inches of documentation this year. Teachers had
one hour to review and respond to this mass of material on the day of the
hearing. Even trained accountants and lawyers who have seen the WEA's books
say they cannot make sense of the documents in that time frame, much less
ask probing questions designed to get at the truth.
The WEA's kangaroo court is an insult to the teachers it claims to represent.
The union's activity is nothing short of a civil rights violation. We are
talking about a very powerful organization, with 34 registered lobbyists
in Olympia. WEA was the state's largest donor to legislative races in 2000
outside of the political parties.
Teachers tell me the union sends political candidate recommendations to
its members on school e-mail systems and through the school mailboxes. They
say the union controls what goes into those mailboxes, and teachers have
in the past been prohibited from distributing information union officials
don't like.
The day before I tried to attend the hearing, a delegation of staff members
from the Evergreen Freedom Foundation and other professionals who volunteered
their time, had sat in the WEA's hearing for several hours before they were
told they must leave or take a vow of silence. They also left rather than
submit to the gag order.
If any public agency conducted itself the way the WEA does, there would
be an outcry heard across the nation. The prospect that public school teachers
are forced to support political causes they don't agree with is perhaps
the largest institutionalized civil rights violation that remains in our
country.
It's time for school board members and legislators to look past the WEA's
election clout and protect Washington's teachers from forced political speech.
Tolerating this kind of union manipulation and abuse of the fair hearing
process is unacceptable.
Ken Eikenberry, semi-retired, is a former state attorney general, state
Republican party chairman, legislator, and FBI agent.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"