Contact: Marsha Richards, Communications Director
(360) 956-3482
Common sense budgeting . . . coming soon?
By Bob Williams We're used to bad news: For many years, governors of our state and
most others have been increasing the size and cost of government without
proper regard to its burden on families and businesses. The results are
predictable: the slightest whiff of economic trouble, and the shaky foundation
begins to crumble.
Our state now has one of the highest unemployment rates in the nation,
and we're facing a $2.5 to $3 billion deficit in the coming biennium. Economic
troubles plague other states as well, but we have been particularly hard
hit. Forecasters tell us we are at least two yearsand a slow climbfrom
recovery.
So how about some good news? With 34 states facing collective deficits
that total nearly $60 billion, Governor Gary Locke and his budget team have
come up with what may be the most innovative solution in the nation.
Used properly, their new budget model would lay the foundation for responsible
state spending, not only now, but in the futureand not only here,
but in any state.
Conventional thinking says there are only two ways to balance a budget:
raise taxes or cut important services. It says budgeting is all about maintaining
the status quo. But the governor and his budget director, Marty Brown, say
there's a third approach: budgeting based on results, without raising taxes.
Instead of blindly struggling to maintain the state's existing budget by
adjusting for inflation and caseload increases and cutting or taxing to
make up the difference, Locke and Brown have wiped the chalkboard clean
and started by answering four very basic questions:
1. How much money does the state have?
2. What does the state want to accomplish?
3. What is the most effective way to accomplish the state's goals with the
money available?
4. How will the state measure its progress in meeting those goals?
Once the governor and his team determined what they believe to be the state's
ten core governing responsibilities, they identified measurable outcomes
and prioritized agency programs within existing resources
based on how effectively they would help meet those goals.
Of course, legislators from both parties and the governor are not likely
to immediately agree on what the state's core functions should be. Some
Republicans don't like the model because Democrats came up with it. Some
Democrats are furious with the governor because they think he just pushed
the hard decisions off to them. Others are ready to throw the whole thing
away because they don't like the ten goals. So change them!
What the governor's model provides is a valuable new set of tools.
It asks the right questions, provides a logical process for determining
the answers, and prioritizes spending accordingly.
Legislators now have a legitimate place to begin the debate and either
ratify or modify these ten functions. And they shouldn't do it arbitrarily.
Lawmakers should keep in mind Article 1, Section 1 of the Washington State
Constitution: "All political power is inherent in the people, and governments
derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, and are established
to protect and maintain individual rights." [emphasis added]
The following questions should be asked about potential core functions
of state government:
1. What should government do, in a broad sense?
2. What should it not do?
3. What essential services are required of government, if it is to successfully
fulfill its proper functions?
Once the legislature has determined the state's core functions, they will
serve as the litmus test for the hundreds of agencies, boards, commissions
and programs currently funded. If an agency or program is not advancing
one of the agreed-upon core functions of government, it should be eliminated.
Of course, you can probably imagine the wailing and anger from currently
protected special interests! The governor and legislators will be pressed
hard on all sides to throw this idea in the dumpster. But if they embrace
Washington's new budget tools, the state will be a pioneer in responsible
state budgeting. This model breaks from the status quo and recognizes a
sensible, responsible approach. Throw in independent, comprehensive performance
audits from the state auditor and taxpayers may finally have the accountability
they've justly been demanding.
Bob Williams is president of the Evergreen Freedom Foundation, a non-profit
public policy research organization based in Olympia.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"