Serial killer claimed workers' comp for
injuries sustained dragging bodies?
Jason Mercier | Evergreen Freedom Foundation
Gary Ridgway is the states most notorious serial killer, and that may
now also make him the most notorious example of fraud and abuse in our workers
compensation system. According to a November 16 Washington
Post story: "If [Ridgway] pulled a muscle while dragging a body
out into the woods, he said, he would claim a work-related injury and collect
workers' compensation."
Is Ridgway telling the truth? We dont know, but since L&I is unlikely
legally permitted to provide us the answer, the Legislature may want to determine
if a fraud investigation has been initiated into Ridgways claims. That
said, were not holding our breath. Our states Department of Labor
and Industries has long been criticized for poor management of the workers
compensation system.
The timing is ironic since, yesterday, the Department announced
another 9.8 percent rate hike in the coming year, which will be added to a
29
percent increase passed last year. (Initial proposals would have increased
rates by 19.4 percent and 40.5 percent in the respective years.)
In a press release announcing the latest increase, L&I attempted to placate
businesses with the promise that the agency also will propose legislation
to strengthen its ability to pursue workers, employers and providers who defraud
the system."
Were curious about how L&I plans to do this and what it is that
is currently prohibiting such oversight now. The Evergreen Freedom Foundation
has filed a public records request to find out just what sort of legislation
the Department proposes.
In stark contrast to the approach taken by Washingtons L&I, Oregon
is cutting workers comp rates and saving its employers approximately
$22.7 million in 2004.
In a September
23 press release, Oregon Governor Ted Kulongoski (D) boasted, "Oregon's
workers' compensation system gives businesses in our state a competitive advantage.
Oregon employers continue to benefit from the strength and ability of a reformed
system built on consensus and cooperation among employers, workers and government.
And our administrative cost savings reaffirm that state agencies are taking
very seriously their responsibility to reduce the economic burden of regulation."
This will be the thirteenth consecutive year Oregon has either cut its workers'
compensation rates or the rates have held stable (most years during that time
period have seen significant rate decreases).
This means stiff competition to keep businesses in our state. Since L&I
seems to be the business antagonist, the legislature will need to intervene
to support and protect the future of jobs in our state.
Jason Mercier is a budget research analyst for the Olympia-based Evergreen
Freedom Foundation, a nonprofit public policy research organization dedicated
to individual liberty, free enterprise and accountable government.
Contact: Jason
Mercier | Budget Research Analyst | 360.956.3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"