Boeing deal unmasks true state of business
climate
Bob Williams | President | Evergreen Freedom Foundation
It should be startling news that Boeing can no longer make a profit in our
state without heavy taxpayer subsidies. Whats gone wrong?
A lot has gone wrong, and the costly deal the governor made to persuade Boeing
to stay proves it.
For most of the last decade, Boeing officials have talked about pulling operations
and jobs out of our state due to our onerous regulatory, land use, taxing,
permitting and transportation policies. Last year, Boeing CEOs announced they
were looking elsewhere to build their new 7E7.
This shook up the governor and other lawmakers, who quickly agreed to a few
much needed unemployment insurance reforms and $3.2 billion in tax relief for
Boeing.
When the news came that Boeing would host its 7E7 project in Washington,
the governor and state officials who vied to win the companys hand were
ecstatic. So were most of the rest of us. It was reported that two hundred
thousands jobs would be safeguarded.
Surprisingly, when our Foundation asked for a copy of the contract, the governors
office gave us the runaround. When we had to threaten public embarrassment
to pry the contract out of the hands of the state agency in charge, we knew
something was wrong.
Once we got the contract, we discovered key parts were missinglike
the exhibits that spell out the important details. I asked for the exhibits
and was told the state didnt have any copies. I couldnt believe
it. How could the state negotiate a $3.2 billion contract and not have copies
of the explanatory material to which it referred?
As I read the contracts 70+ pages, I was dismayed to discover a small
provision in the agreement instructing all parties with access to the contract
to do whatever they could to keep the details out of the hands of the public.
And sure enough, when we finally obtained copies of the exhibits, much of the
information was blacked out.
Why this attempt at secrecy? Reading page after page of the contract, the
answer became clear. The concessions were astounding.
The governor has agreed to consult with Boeing in the hiring of six full-time
state employees who will be responsible for expediting Boeings permit
requests; coordinating projects for Boeing with state and local government;
advising Boeing on state tax policies; coordinating all transportation matters
between Boeing and state and local agencies; coordinating environmental matters
for Boeing; and coordinating workforce development matters.
On top of that, Boeing will receive priority over all other same-day applicants
when it applies for permits, and those permits shall be issued
within 60 days.
The state will build a state-of-the-art employee training center, which Boeing
and its suppliers will have exclusive use of for the first five years. All
details about the facilityaside from the requirement for the state to
paywere redacted from information provided in response to a public records
request. The state will also recruit, screen, assess and train the workforce
needed for the 7E7 project.
The state will give Boeing favorable treatment in its environmental impact
analyses, and the company will receive sales, use and property tax breaks.
The contract promises the state will hire a nationally-recognized consulting
firm to publish a study showing the economic benefits of Boeings project
for Washington. It allows Boeing to consult on legal counsel the state will
use to make final determination about the contracts legality.
The fact is, every time the governor promises the state will do something,
he is promising that the taxpayers will pay for it. The money to fulfill these
obligations comes from taxpayersoften the owners of other businesses
that do not receive this kind of preferential treatment.
When asked about the special provisions for Boeing, Governor Locke claimed
that all businesses in our state receive similar assistance. This is untrue.
Our states business climate is so bad that more than 90,000 manufacturing
jobs have already been lost. The governor only convinced Boeing to stay by
offering protection from the policies his own agencies created.
Boeing doesnt need corporate welfare from taxpayers, and neither does
any other business. What they need is the freedom to compete, and the freedom
to succeed.
Most lawmakers were shocked to learn about the special provisions made for
Boeing on their behalf. Some are downright angry. It remains to be seen if
they will strip the contract of the illegitimate offers and extend the legitimate
reforms to all businesses in our state. If they do, the 2004 Legislature will
leave a wonderful legacy that will last well into the future.
Bob Williams is president of the Evergreen Freedom Foundation, an Olympia-based
policy research organization dedicated to individual liberty, free enterprise
and limited government.
Contact: Jason
Mercier | Budget Research Analyst | 360.956.3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"