Bob Williams | President | Evergreen Freedom Foundation
Despite all the signs that Washingtons business climate is in need of
serious reform, it took a $715,000 taxpayer-funded contract with a consulting
firm to spell it out for Governor Locke, and it would seem Washingtons
state officials still havent gotten the point.
In the quest to win Boeings 7E7 final assembly project, the state contracted
with Boeings own consultant, Deloitte & Touche, to study how Washington
compared with other states. While the states contract with Deloitte raises
many conflict-of-interest issues, the studys findings demonstrate what
any business owner in the state could have told us for
free.
Deloittes report
gave Washington a "disadvantage" rating in seven key areas: labor
costs, unemployment insurance, workers' compensation, construction costs,
state and local tax rates, environmental permitting, and overall business
climate.
Thats 0-7. Lets be glad the Mariners got off to a better start
than that.
To address these concerns, the state turned to massive subsidies and a few
modest reforms. Unfortunately, with the exception of small changes in unemployment
insurance, most of the legitimate reforms and all of the subsidies went only
to Boeing.
And even these were not enough. As Benjamin Romano reported in the Yakima
Herald-Republic: "Boeing is still concerned about the business climate
in Washington. And despite billions of dollars in state incentives to land
assembly of Boeings next generation 7E7 commercial airplane, Washington
is, in many respects, business unfriendly . . ."
According to Romanos article, Boeing still has the following concerns:
The state has some of the highest business-tax burdens in the country,
mostly because of the business and occupation tax.
While unemployment insurance costs will rise less because of last years
reforms, Washingtons program is still very expensive relative to other
states.
Workers compensation premiums are "rapidly" increasing.
"Unless we get reform," [Boeing] said, "our system will get
more and more expensive."
Boeings concerns about Washingtons business climate are not new.
In 1999, Boeing CFO Debby Hopkins told a Chamber of Commerce co-sponsored event:
"Compared to everywhere else we do business, Washington is below average.
To remain a global leader for aerospaceand a global leader for other
industriesWashington has to rank a whole lot higher than that."
Several states have proven that the tough changes needed to improve the business
climate can be made:
New York implemented several key reforms, which had a dramatic impact on
the states business climate (now ranked 11th). The state made historic
reductions in taxes; pushed through needed regulatory reforms; repealed an
energy tax on businesses; deregulated energy markets; reformed its unemployment
insurance system; and reformed its workers' compensation system, which reduced
costs for employers.
Pennsylvania, ranked 16th, has a similar story. After a series of reforms
in the late 1990s, the Lincoln Institute reported that when economists were
asked to rank which reforms most improved the state's business climate, 34
percent said workers' compensation reform and 28 percent said the cut in the
corporate income tax ratethe top two responses.
At the time, Lowman S. Henry, Chairman of the Lincoln Institute made a prediction:
"Clearly the business climate reforms undertaken in Pennsylvania during
the past four years are beginning to have some impact... What the economists
are telling us in this survey is we've got to pick up the pace of reform if
we want to make progress relative to other states."
Mr. Henry was correct. Aggressive reforms slowed, and state job creation
is now lagging. Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell is now proposing a new plan
to borrow over a billion dollars and spend it on economic development. According
to the April 2004 Keystone Business Climate Survey, 72 percent of the business
owners responding said they disagree with Rendells plan39 percent
of those disagree strongly.
According to Mr. Henry, "the business owners said they would prefer
the state lower taxes and cut regulations. Ninety-two percent favored that
approach over the Rendell borrow-and-spend plan...."
Unlike Pennsylvania, North Carolina has not rested on its laurels. According
to Site Selection Magazine, which makes the annual ranking of business
climates, North Carolina has had the number one business climate for the last
three years and continues to make all the right moves, including freezing its
unemployment tax rate last year.
By contrast, it has been nearly a decade since Washington was counted among
the top 25 business climates.
Unfortunately, measures addressing minimum wage reform, regulatory reform
and workers compensation reforms all passed Washingtons state Senate
this year, but died in the House.
Some legislators still insist on trying to solve problems by using tax revenue
to prop up businesses the state deems worthy; but only long-term improvements
to the fundamental costs of doing business in the state will improve the overall
business climate. Legitimate statewide reforms must be the priority of all
state officials.
Washington can be transformed from a state with a "disadvantageous"
business climate to one that fosters economic expansion, but bold leadership
and a sustained effort like that in North Carolina is needed. Otherwise, Washington
will continue to suffer job losses, budget shortfalls and economic uncertainty.
Bob Williams is president of the Evergreen Freedom Foundation, an Olympia-based
policy research organization dedicated to individual liberty, free enterprise
and limited government.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"