Performance Audits: Blueprint for Government
Accountability
by Bob Williams & Jason Mercier
Imagine losing $261,000 worth of your company's propertylaptop computers,
cell phones, and digital cameras.
Perhaps if you had a long and trusted history, no record of negligent or
criminal behavior, and a very good story, your boss might accept your explanation.
He might allow you to pay back the amount missing or come to some arrangement.
But we all know the more likely result of this situation: a pink slip at
best, and a criminal complaint at worst. Either way, there will be a price
to pay. You will be held accountable.
Unless, of course, the corporate entity you happen to work for is Washington
state, and your chief executive officer is Governor Gary Locke.
As evidenced by the state auditor's recent Statewide
Accountability Report, the risk of tax dollars being mismanaged or stolen
is still a serious problem. Among this year's audit findings:
$5.8 million in employer workers' compensation premiums could
not be accounted for.
$1.3 million in Medicaid payments were provided to illegal aliens
contrary to federal law.
More than $700,000 in unemployment insurance benefits was paid
to ineligible claimants.
One agency lost $261,000 worth of equipment (laptop computers,
digital cameras, etc.) and didn't report these losses as required by state
law.
Adequate criminal background checks on child care and early learning
employee applicants are not being conducted.
These findings show some state agencies are not complying with state and
federal laws, and others are reluctant to or incapable of accounting for
the money and resources entrusted to them.
The Statewide Accountability (SAO) Report revealed the unsettling fact
that many agencies were cited with multiple repeat findings. The Washington
State Ferry system, for example, has been cited with the same audit finding
for nearly two decades!
What is more disturbing is the fact that Governor Locke, Washington's CEO,
has not commented on these audit findings, and no one has been held responsible.
(Where is Donald Trump when you need him?)
Achieving efficient and effective management and operation of state government
requires transparency and accountability in the management of tax dollars.
The SAO report, as worrisome as it is, is just the tip of the iceberg. It
only addresses violations of law and reporting standards. Imagine the potential
savings to taxpayers if the state auditor was permitted to conduct comprehensive
performance audits of state programs and agencies.
Performance audits consist of periodic reviews of the economy, efficiency
and effectiveness of the policies, management, fiscal affairs, and operations
of state government, conducted in accordance with the U.S. General Accounting
Office Government Auditing Standards.
Similar performance reviews in Texas have saved taxpayers there $9 billion
out of $19 billion in identified savings over the past decade.
Currently, Washington is the only state in the nation that prohibits the
independently elected state auditor from doing the job he was hired to do
without explicit legislative permission. This handicap is costing the state
untold millionsif not billionsof dollars in potential savings.
Thankfully, it can be easily remedied.
The scope of real performance audits should be established by the elected
state auditor, not an unelected group of citizens appointed by the governor
and legislature, as past legislative audit proposals would have mandated.
To assure legislative action and participation (something currently lacking
in regular audits), the auditor would forward findings to the legislature
each year, and the legislature would annually report on the implementation
status of the auditor's recommendations. Both the audits and the corrective
action would be reported publicly on the state auditor's website.
This would improve the current process by guaranteeing the auditor's findings
result in corrective action.
It is a dereliction of duty if the legislature and governor fail to enact
performance audits and hold state officials accountable for their fraud
and mismanagement.
At the end of the day, however, if the CEO doesn't act, the stockholders
can.
Our state constitution recognizes that setting Washington on the right
course may only occur through direct action by the people. If the legislature
continues its refusal to authorize truly independent and comprehensive performance
audits, and the governor refuses to lead, it may be incumbent on the people
to bring about this reform through initiative. We've waited long enough.
Jason Mercier is a budget research analyst for the Evergreen Freedom
Foundation, a non-profit public policy research organization dedicated to
individual liberty, free enterprise and accountable government. Bob Williams
is the foundation's President.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"