The subject for our game today is the Marysville teachers' strike. Prior
to the start of this academic year, teachers in Marysville went on strike
for a state-record 49 days, effectively delaying the start of the term until
October 22. Since state law mandates 180-days of academic instruction to
constitute a full academic year, the lockout has had the effect of pushing
back the start of summer vacation until July 19th. So, without further ado,
let us pose the all-encompassing question: "Who's to blame?"
Could we blame the striking teachers for not solving this problem soon
enough to get classes in session (classes that they are being paid
to teach with the tax dollars of the parents in the Marysville school district)
and instead going on strike (illegally) at the expense of their students?
Maybe.
Could we blame the Marysville school board for not taking legal action
immediately when the teachers went on strike (illegally) and later turning
around and hiding behind their shield of "it's the law" when the
180-day year extended into late July? Possibly.
Could we blame the Washington Education Association for claiming to be
for the kids and then supporting and endorsing teacher strikes as a bargaining
tactic at their expense? Probably.
Could we blame the Marysville Education Association for claiming that "only
the school board has the power to make it happen" [get the schools
going again] when they themselves were the ones who organized the strike?
(See, even they play the blame-game). Most likely.
Could we blame the courts and the attorney general's office for not upholding
soon enough the countless Washington state court rulings that prohibit teachers
from going on strike? Definitely.
Could we blame the Accountability and Integrity for Marysville Schools (AIMS)
parents' association for supporting the teachers who walked out of the schools
that their kids were supposed to be in? How about Superintendent of Public
Instruction Terry Bergeson for failing to step in? How about Speaker of
the House Chopp for shooting down legislation that would have prevented
this from ever happening? For that matter, how about even Governor Locke?
Of course!
Conspicuously missing from this list of groups and individuals potentially
to blame are the innocent kids whose summer was cut short by the people
whose example they are now emulating as they strike to get their summer
vacation back. Unlike their teachers who went on strike and got away with
it, however, the striking students are enduring both sunburns and suspensions
for standing up for what they know is right. Marysville School Board President
Vicki Gates would have us believe that the "extended summer" the
kids in her district enjoyed last year was payment in full for having to
stay in class two weeks after Independence Day, but the only reason that
summer was "extended" was because of the illegal strike!
The truth is there are a plethora of pitfalls that come with this situation.
What of the students whose families were planning on going on vacation (like
the millions of other American families who do so after school gets out)?
What about the students who were planning on trying to find summer work
who are now behind their peers in the already miniscule teen job-market?
What about the students who lost summer internships and academic scholarships
in preparation for college? What about the students who very nearly lost
their appointments to military academies (and hence might've had to pay
$80,000-$100,000 dollars for a college education that would have otherwise
been free!)?
It seems to me that too many people involved were concerned with everything
and everyone except the students. Shame on the allegedly adult individuals
who postponed the one and only thing that a kid looks forward to the whole
year he or she is in school: the day they get out.
Let's face it folks, the students aren't the ones to blame here; they're
just the ones taking the heat for it. I, for one, say the next time this
happens, we ought to hand the dunce-caps out to somebody else and let the
kids go play.
Mike Throgmorton is a student at Whitworth College in Spokane and a
research assistant at the Evergreen Freedom Foundation, an Olympia-based
policy research organization dedicated to free-market principles.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"