Bob Williams | Evergreen Freedom Foundation In his opinion column, Right-wingers go after workers
group in the Nov. 10 Columbian, Washington State Labor Council president
Rick Bender asserted that the WSLC "is open and honest about its funding
and its agenda." If only it could be transparent about its political
spending as well.
The Evergreen Freedom Foundation, or EFF, filed a complaint against the
WSLC, the state affiliate of the AFL-CIO, for failing to disclose its political
expenditures to the public. The investigation by the Public Disclosure Commission
revealed that in 2002, the WSLC spent over $500,000 on state elections,
not including its expenditures for voter registration, training or list
maintenance.
The WSLC also allocated additional resources for federal campaigns, transfers
to its political action committee, direct contributions and lobbying.
If the WSLC actually reported its political spending, it would rank as
one of the top three largest political action committees in the state. In
August, AFL-CIO President John Sweeney told union leaders in Tacoma that
the "biggest and most important thing right now" was the presidential
election.
The WSLC spent a full 32 percent of its expenditures from nonpublic sources
on political activity and only a fraction of this was reported to the state.
Nearly half of the WSLCs income comes from public grants. How much
money can this organization covertly spend on politics before the public
gets to know about it?
Union dues coerced The real tragedy is that the WSLCs political agenda is funded
from coerced union membership dues. Working men and women are, and should
be, free to spend their money on politics, but it should be a voluntary
choicenot one union officials make for them. Perhaps the WSLC should
leave its sizable political fund in the hands of the workers it represents.
In his guest column, Bender also blasts EFF for being a "secretive
organization," ignoring the fact that (unlike his own organization)
EFF is completely funded by voluntary donors. Ironically, the WSLC reports
to the Internal Revenue Service that it spends "zero" dollars
on politics. Whos really keeping secrets?
Benders indignation over EFFs complaint is especially disingenuous
in light of his organization filing 11 PDC complaints against business organizations
last year. The PDC dismissed every one of those complaints earlier this
year.
Unfortunately, the Public Disclosure Commission decided to not recommend
the WSLC for prosecution, despite the hundreds of thousands of dollars it
spends every election.
However, this does not change the fact that the publics interest
in transparent elections requires openness and aggressive enforcement.
When the law calls for full disclosure in state politics, no organization
is entitled to a free pass.
Bob Williams is president of the Evergreen Freedom Foundation, an Olympia-based
policy research organization.
Contact: Michael Reitz | Legal
Research Analyst | 360-956-3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"