Governor Locke signed the legislature’s two-year, $22.8 billion budget on Tuesday, June 26th, but vetoed all attempts to hold state government accountable for efficient spending of taxpayer money.
Locke vetoed a provision in a transportation funding bill (SB 5327) that would have outlined performance-based budgeting requirements for state transportation agencies.
The governor also vetoed a provision in the Senate budget bill (SB 6153) that called for allowing the State Auditor to conduct three performance audits of state agencies so lawmakers can decide if further audits are merited. Washington is the only state in the nation that does not allow its State Auditor to conduct performance audits.
Locke claims he vetoed the accountability measures because performance-based audit procedures are already in place. In reality, State Auditor Brian Sonntag – the people’s elected government watchdog – has his hands tied. Sonntag is not permitted to conduct any performance audits without the approval of both the legislature and the governor. As a result, comprehensive performance audits are rare.
The majority of the state’s 147 elected representatives have just called for performance-based audits in this budget, but Governor Locke says "No."
"Legislators wrote a budget that included more money and more accountability," said Bob Williams, president of the Olympia-based Evergreen Freedom Foundation. "The governor has taken the money and dropped the accountability."
Locke claims he will make the Department of Transportation as efficient as it can be. But, Williams notes, "Governor Locke can say anything he wants because he has made it impossible for citizens to check his work."
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"