Last fall, our governor sent out memos to state agencies urging them to reduce hiring and other spending. It didn’t work.
In the face of recent data showing increasing revenue shortfalls, the governor has replaced memos with agency directives. This falls far short of the necessary action. In fact, employee groups potentially affected by the cutbacks are already threatening negative consequences, like strikes and suspension of student tests. Public conversations about balancing the budget by cutting services for the most vulnerable members of society have begun. Governor Locke needs to nip this in the bud.
An Executive Order with enforcement mechanisms is needed. NOW! Agencies should give the governor and lawmakers decision packages: lists of cuts that can be made, prioritized in order of how those cuts affect each agency’s mission. If agency directors were paying any attention to the governor last fall, those lists should already be prepared. Lawmakers and the governor can review those lists, keeping in mind the warning from our state’s chief forecaster that this downturn will likely last for three years.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"