Contact: Jason Mercier, Budget Research Analyst
(360) 956-3482 or jmercier@effwa.org
Your paycheck is finally yours May 9 is Tax Freedom Day for Washingtonians
Tomorrow, taxpayers in Washington will earn the first dollars of the year
not earmarked for their tax burden. Washingtonians worked 129 days this
year to reach to reach Tax Freedom Day. Only taxpayers in Connecticut have
to work longer in 2002 to pay their total tax burden.
Tax Freedom Day has been calculated by the non-profit Tax Foundation since
1937. Using a formula to determine the total federal, state and local tax
burdens across the nation, the foundation has issued rankings to the states
and highlighted on which date taxpayers reach Tax Freedom Day.
In comparison to our neighbors, Washington’s total tax burden is by far the highest:
State
Ranking
Tax Freedom Day
% of income
Days Worked
Idaho
37
April 20
30.3
110
Oregon
33
April 21
30.5
111
California
10
April 29
32.7
119
Washington
2
May 9
35.6
129
While Washington currently ranks second in the nation for total tax burden
as a percentage of income (at 35.6%), actions in Olympia this fall may guarantee
the state a first place finish next year. The current budget outlook and
rumblings about "revenue not keeping pace with expenditures" indicate
a desire by some to increase Washington's state and local tax burden.
"To avoid a first place finish next year, legislators must look past
the tendency to blame taxpayers for not keeping pace with their spending
habits," said Bob Williams, EFF's president. "Instead of spending
like they have a blank check, lawmakers must use the same budget principles
our families use: spend only what you have."
Williams went on to say, "It took 129 days to pay our tax bill in 2002
and already whispers of increasing our local tax burden threaten to steal
more days away from working for our families next year. At least for the
rest of this year we can finally cash our paychecks for ourselves instead
of making a direct deposit into government's coffers."
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"