Contact: Marsha Richards, Communications Director
(360) 956-3482
Supreme Court: Children trump
system...finally!
In a 5-4 ruling issued this morning, the U.S. Supreme Court
upheld the constitutionality of the Cleveland school voucher program. The
program gives parents a stipend for a portion of the tax dollars that support
their childs education, allowing them to use that stipend to move
their children out of schools they believe are failing their children.
The ruling reflects a sentiment already prevalent in Washington, where
Seattle ranks among the highest in the nation for the percentage of parents
who choose to bypass the public school system and send their children to
private schools. Nearly one in three Seattle students attend private schools,
according to the Census Bureau.
Lynn Harsh, executive director and senior education analyst for the Olympia-based
Evergreen Freedom Foundation, made the following comments about the Supreme
Court decision:
The Supreme Court decision acknowledges that the right of children
to get an excellent education trumps the right of education bureaucrats
to protect their turf. The adults running the current monopoly system will
just have to move over and make room for kids and their parents. What a
novel concept!
Forcing schools to compete for students helps every school become
better - public or private. Public school officials now need to insist that
lawmakers unshackle them from senseless and costly regulation so they can
compete on a level playing field.
Perhaps this will truly end the separate but equal hypocrisy
perpetuated in our country. All parents, regardless of income or geography,
now know that their children really have an opportunity to achieve the American
Dream.
A press release issued by the Washington Education Association this morning
asserts that the ruling is expected to have little impact on Washingtons
public school system.
It is arrogant and elitist for WEA president Charles Hasse to assume
parents in our state dont want choices when those who can afford to
make them obviously do, said Harsh. This ruling will extend
those choices to low-income families who also want an excellent education
for their children.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"