Contact: Marsha Richards, Communications Director
(360) 956-3482
Judge throws NEA case back
to PDC
In a ruling this morning, Thurston County Superior Court
Judge Paula Casey remanded a campaign finance case brought by the Evergreen
Freedom Foundation against the National Education Association back to the
state Public Disclosure Commission.
Judge Casey cited an Appellate Court ruling -- handed down after EFF filed
suit on behalf of teachers -- in deciding that EFFs citizen action
had been filed prematurely, but said she expected to see the Foundation
back in court immediately if the PDC does not recommend enforcement
action against the NEA at its meeting next Tuesday.
In this case, a government agency charged with enforcing the law
has a staff recommendation that this case not be pursued because of the
cost of this litigation, said Casey. I would expect [EFF] to
be back here immediately if [the PDC doesnt] do something at its next
meeting. That would be evidence that theyre not intending to act.
PDC staff investigated EFFs complaint earlier this year and found
the NEA guilty of taking money from thousands of teachers in Washington
state and illegally spending it on politics. NEAs state affiliate,
the Washington Education Association, was found guilty of intentionally
violating the same law last year and ordered to pay more than $770,000 in
penalties.
EFF filed suit against the NEA April 8 after PDC staff recommended the
attorney general seek a settlement with substantial penalties,
but stated that: If a settlement cannot be reached . . . staff do
not recommend that the Attorney General proceed with litigation based on
the current budget cutbacks and the cost of such litigation.
Staff of the PDC and the attorney generals office concurred with
EFF that the timing of the citizen action was appropriate under the governing
statute. Judge Casey also expressed agreement with EFFs interpretation
of the citizen action provision, but deferred to what she called an unnecessary
and over-broad statement in the Court of Appeals ruling.
If the Attorney General declines to take enforcement action, EFF will pursue
the case.
We expect the Attorney General to aggressively pursue this case in
proportion to her prosecution of the WEAs identical violations last
year, said Bob Williams. That means significant fines and penalties
for willful violations of the law, and meaningful remedies to ensure the
NEA does not wrong teachers in the future. The NEA is many times larger
than its state affiliate and the unions own general counsel admits
all of its expenditures are political.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"