Contact: Marsha Richards, Communications Director
(360) 956-3482
Attorney General files suit
against NEA
OLYMPIA, WA - Washington State Attorney General Christine
Gregoire filed a lawsuit against the National Education Association late
yesterday afternoon in the Thurston County Superior Court.
The suit charges the NEA with illegally spending fees taken from nonmember
teachers* to advance political causes, and stems from a complaint filed
by the Olympia-based Evergreen Freedom Foundation, a non-profit public policy
research organization.
The case was referred to the Attorney General this week after being investigated
by the states Public Disclosure Commission, a campaign finance enforcement
agency. Commissioners found the NEA guilty of apparent multiple violations,
but felt their maximum fine of $2,500 was not sufficient for the magnitude
of the case. The Attorney General can request fines of up to $10,000 per
violation.
A similar lawsuit against the NEAs state affiliate (WEA) resulted
in a $400,000 fine last year, the largest in state history for campaign
finance violations. The WEA was also required to return nearly $200,000
to teachers.
Were pleased the Attorney General is aggressively pursuing
this case, said Marsha Richards, EFFs communications director.
Her office did a good job investigating the WEA last year, and only
a thorough investigation will uncover the full extent of the NEAs
violations.
* Teachers who opt out of the union become agency fee payers.
They are required to pay fees equal to regular union dues (average annual
dues: $733), but state law strictly prohibits the use of agency fees for
political activity without permission from individual teachers. There are
about 4,000 nonmember teachers in Washington state.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"