OLYMPIA, WA - With 34 states facing budget deficits that total
nearly $60 billion collectively, governors and state lawmakers are scrambling
to find solutions. A new budget model announced yesterday by Washington
State Governor Gary Locke may be one of the most innovative.
Washington is facing a deficit of $2.5 to $3 billion (10-12 percent of
total state revenue) in the upcoming 2003-05 biennium. Conventional thinking
says lawmakers must look at the existing budget, adjust for inflationary
and caseload increases, and find ways to raise taxes or cut services to
maintain the status quo.
Instead, Governor Locke and his budget team decided on ten core functions
for Washington state government, identified measurable outcomes, and prioritized
agency programs based on their ability to help achieve those ten functions.
He was aided in this task by a requirement that Washington state agencies
define their core missions and prioritize their programs and budgets accordingly.
This model was drafted to allocate money within existing resources.
We dont agree with everything Governor Locke has identified
as a core function of government, but that doesnt diminish the value
of these tools, said Bob Williams, president of the Evergreen Freedom
Foundation. Legislators now have a legitimate place to begin the debate.
The Washington state-based Evergreen Freedom Foundation, a free-market
public policy research organization, has long advocated core functions and
performance-based budgeting.
This approach is revolutionary and provides tools for states to solve
their budget crises without slash and burn strategies, said Williams.
Its not a temporary band-aid, but a permanent foundation for
responsible state spending now and in the future.
EFF believes hundreds of millions of dollars currently being lost to excessive
bureaucracy would be saved if states focused on organizing their budgets
around what lawmakers negotiate as a states core governing functions,
rather than blindly funding the status quo.
Implementing this new model will take determined and strong leadership,
said Williams. There are a lot of special interest groups out there
who wont like it when the focus shifts from maintaining current government
services to evaluating whether those services should even be provided by
government.
To view the National Stewardship Project, a study on accountable budgets
and core governing principles released jointly by EFF, the Heritage Foundation,
and the State Policy Network, click
here.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"