Contact: Marsha Richards, Communications Director
(360) 956-3482
WEA refunds thousands to teachers
Thousands of Washington public school teachers and classified
staff received refunds this week from the Washington Education Association
(WEA) as a result of a Thurston County Superior Court order last year.
The WEA was ordered to refund a portion of the agency fees paid by non-members*
each year after a lawsuit determined the union had illegally spent the money
to influence elections without permission from teachers.
The lawsuit, filed in October 2000 by Attorney General Christine Gregoire,
has now cost the union nearly $1 million. The penalties included a $400,000
fine for what the judge called intentional violations of the law, refunds
to 4,000 teachers, and $190,000 in legal fees paid to the Attorney General's
office.
The case was sparked by a complaint from the Evergreen Freedom Foundation,
an Olympia-based policy research organization and long-time advocate for
teachers' paycheck protection rights.
The WEA has not publicly released information about the number of teachers
receiving a refund this year, nor the amount of each refund. A similar refund
last year sent to 4,000 teachers statewide totaled about $200,000.
The WEA's parent organization, the National Education Association, is currently
being sued by Attorney General Gregoire for violations of the same law.
*Agency fee payers are teachers who are not members of the union but
are still required to pay fees equal to 100 percent of the union's mandatory
dues. Washington state law expressly prohibits the union from spending any
agency fees for political purposes without individual authorization from
teachers.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"