Search EFFWA Site:

EFF's Election Report ·  
Gonzales Letter ·  
Welfare Reform ·  
Boeing Contract ·  
Budget & Taxes ·  
Business Climate ·  
K-12 Fact Sheet ·  
EFF Health Study ·  
Paycheck Protection ·  
Transportation ·  
Unemployment Ins. ·  

Receive Updates ·  
Bookmark EFF ·  
Contribute ·  
EFF in the News ·  
How Can I Help? ·  
Join EFF ·  
Media Center ·  

NEWS ADVISORY
December 16, 2002

Contact: Marsha Richards, Communications Director
(360) 956-3482

Locke's 2003-05 budget

OLYMPIA, WA—Governor Gary Locke will announce the details of his no-new-taxes budget tomorrow morning, leaving legislators to decide whether to approve or modify his spending plan. The governor has hinted that planned cuts will be painful, but with a $2-$3 billion deficit looming lawmakers must remember the lessons of history and resist the temptation to raise taxes in an economy that simply cannot support a heavier tax burden.

In the early 1990s, many states were facing similar budget problems. The governors who took strong and decisive action—not only refusing to raise taxes, but actually cutting them and seizing opportunities to institute much-needed reforms—were rewarded with job growth and economic stability, as well as re-election. Conversely, many of the states that attempted to balance their budgets by increasing taxes did so at the expense of jobs and business, thus making the problem worse.

Using an innovative new model that focuses on core governing functions, Governor Locke has written a budget balanced within existing revenues. To aid in this process, he asked all state agencies to submit a list of their activities prioritized into three categories: high, medium and low. The governor's final budget was based in part on these self-identified priorities (excluding the agencies in charge of higher education and K-12, who refused to comply with the request).

As legislators review the budget to decide which activities and programs should be streamlined or eliminated, they should take a close look at the priorities identified by agencies. Some raise serious questions. Consider the Department of Transportation's priorities:

High priority: Roadside/landscape maintenance, rest area operation, headquarters management.
Low priority: Audits, highway construction mobility improvements, transportation planning.

Do these priorities reflect the core purpose of government and the will of Washington citizens?

Once a program is identified as a core function of government, legislators should consider how it can best be delivered (should it be contracted out?) and which level of government can do so most effectively.

It remains to be seen if Governor Locke and his colleagues in the legislature will make the tough decisions necessary to refocus state budgeting on core functions. It will not happen overnight, but it is possible right now to balance the budget without raising taxes. If they do not, it is EFF's prediction that voters will mount an initiative campaign to pass the most punitive tax and spending limits the state has yet seen.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Governor Locke's 2003-05 proposed spending plan
Governor Locke's "Priorities of Government" (POG)
State Auditor Brian Sonntag's call for performance audits
Agency priorities (PDF)
Agency activity summaries (PDF)


Evergreen Freedom Foundation
P.O. Box 552, Olympia, WA 98507
Phone: (360) 956-3482, Fax: (360) 352-1874
Email: effwa@effwa.org


Election Reform


Grassroots Washington

Performance Audit Pledge
View pledge results

Health Plan 4 Life

Ten-Minute Citizen

WashingtonVotes.org

ChoosingLiberty.org

1 Part Honesty; 2 Parts Arrogance

At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:

"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"

- Rep. Jim McIntire (D - 46)
(360) 786-7886

Despite the arrogance of some state officials, Washington's constitution is clear: "All political power is inherent in the people..."

Court of Appeals Ruling AG's WEA Appeal What is the WEA Hiding? Determining Government's Core Functions Priorities of Government Stewardship Series School Directors' Handbook Professional Choices For WA Educators Congressional Testimony (6/20/02) Agency Rule Change Request Social Security Calculator Tax Dividend Calculator Public Records Requests