Contact: Jason Mercier,
Budget Research Analyst
(360) 956-3482
Revenue for 2003-05 up $1.3
billion$238 million less than planned
Based on the uncertainty surrounding the war in Iraq and the
expectation that Washington's economic recovery will not be realized until
sometime in 2004, the state's March revenue forecast projects a drop in
revenue for 2003-05 of $238 million. This is the news from Dr. Chang Mook
Sohn, the state's chief economist. Despite this drop, overall revenue for
2003-05 is projected to be $1.3 billion more than 2001-03a 6 percent
increase.
This information must be put in context with three myths widely circulated
around the state.
1.
Myth: State revenue is down.
Fact: State revenue is forecasted to INCREASE by $1.3 billion
(6 percent) in 2003-05.
2003-05 estimated revenue $22,452 million
2001-03 estimated revenue $21,163 million Increase $1,289 million or $1.3 billion.
2.
Myth: State spending is being cut.
Fact: Despite talk of massive cuts, Governor Locke's proposed 2003-05
budget INCREASES state spending by $528 million.
2003-05 estimated expenditures $22,979.4 million
2001-03 estimated expenditures $22,451.4 million Increase $528.0 million
3.
Our state has a $2.6 billion deficit.
Fact: There is no $2.6 billion deficit. The budget the governor submitted
was balanced. With today's news that the revenue forecast would be reduced
by $238 million, the governor has a $238 million deficit in his proposed
budget (assuming the governor's original $57.1 million ending fund balance)not
a $2.6 billion deficit.
Now to the issue of how our state will recover economically. Dr. Sohn restated
his belief that our recovery will lag behind the rest of the nation, regardless
of what happens in Iraq. The remedy, according to Dr. Sohn is job growth,
which he believes depends on increased profit-margins for business.
Lawmakers have distinctly different opinions on how those jobs should be
created. One model is heavily dependent on borrowing and job creation through
public works projects paid by increased taxes. The other depends on some
borrowing and job creation in the private sector financed by increased business
profits.
Senator Lisa Brown (D-3) says some spending cuts can be made, but not enough
to balance the budget. Brown believes more revenue is needed and said the
"affluent aren't feeling the pinch." She argues for borrowing
and "revenue enhancements" to fund various public works projects
to create jobs. The governor has not used the "t" word, but he
is advocating borrowing to the maximum allowed by law.
Senator Dino Rossi (R-1) and Rep. Jack Cairnes (R-47) believe spending
should be cut and taxes should not be increased. They want jobs created
in the private sector by making Washington more friendly for businesses
to stay and to relocate from other states.
Three points to consider: 1) The last time we experienced nationwide recessionary
problems (in the 1990s), states that decreased taxes and cut spending ended
up with great gains in revenue. 2) Governor Locke and others want to borrow
on future lottery proceeds. This is dangerous. Part of the revenue reduction
from today's forecast rests on $55 million less profit than expected from
the state lottery due to our participation in the multi-state Mega Millions
lottery. 3) Affluent people are the ones who start or expand businesses
and create jobs. "Pinching" them further is economic foolishness.
"Dr. Sohn's predictions confirmed what most Washingtonians already
know and are trying to communicate to their lawmakers," said Bob Williams,
President of the Evergreen Freedom Foundation. "Increasing taxes and
trying to borrow our way is the worst possible decision lawmakers could
make. We have a spending problem, not a revenue problem."
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"