Contact: Marsha Richards,
Communications Director
(360) 956-3482
EFF ad targets union concealment
YAKIMA A newspaper
ad designed by the Evergreen Freedom Foundation (EFF) ran in todays
Yakima Herald-Republic (page 11A) targeting officials of the Washington
Education Association for concealing their political goals from the unions
own members and the public.
The ad, which coincides with the WEAs annual representative assembly
held in Yakima this year, features a locked file cabinet under the bold
headline: "Whats in this locked file cabinet? The Washington
Education Association doesnt want you to know."
The graphic was inspired by a file cabinet containing the unions
ambitious 1996 political plan (described by one judge as a "smoking
gun"), which sat locked at EFFs office for five years during
litigation. WEA officials refused to disclose the documents until a judge
ordered them to pay a $15,000 fine, and they sought and obtained a protective
order to seal the plan from their members and the public. Only EFF attorneys
and a few staff members were permitted to read it.
"The last thing WEA officials want teachers and the public to know
is what their political goals really are," said Bob Williams, EFFs
president. "They know teachers would refuse to pay for their activity
and the public would be outraged. We think union officials need to answer
to that."
Teachers in Washington state are required to pay the WEA an average of
$744 each year as a condition of employment. Those who object to the unions
political goals are forced to go through a complicated process to request
a partial refund each year.
"The WEA makes it very difficult for teachers to exercise their right
to say no to forced political speech," said Williams. "Thats
wrong and un-American."
The Foundation is also concerned that the WEAs considerable political
influence is concealed from Washington citizens. The newspaper
ad states: "Were not allowed to tell you whats in the
cabinet, but we can tell you that behind the WEA is the powerful National
Education Association, which has sent hundreds of thousands of dollars and
many well-trained political operatives into our state to influence our elections."
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"