Contact: Marsha Richards,
Communications Director
(360) 956-3482
Citizens pitch in to buy newspaper
ad and send message to legislators
OLYMPIA A large, full-color newspaper
ad that will appear in The Olympian tomorrow is the work of nearly
one hundred talk radio listeners who pitched in to buy the space.
The ad, which targets our lawmakers failure to adopt true performance
audits, was the idea of a listener who called The Mike Siegel Show on Seattles
KTTH 770 AM. Siegel teamed up
with the Evergreen Freedom Foundation (EFF) to design the ad and asked his
audience to cover the cost of placement if they were concerned about government
accountability. Donations poured in.
The ad features a crafty fox and an alarmed chicken with the caption: "Hell
guard the chickens. Yeah, and legislators will audit themselves." Text
below the caption continues, "Foxes shouldnt guard henhouses.
And state spenders shouldnt audit their own spending. But they will
if we let them."
Targeted by the ad are the flurry of recent "performance audit"
bills passed by legislators in response to an increasing demand from voters
for accountability in state spending. The bills would bypass the states
independently elected state auditor, putting control of audits in the hands
of legislative committees or citizen boards appointed by state officials.
None are the comprehensive performance audits advertised to voters and the
media.
Legislators also exempted themselves from the audits.
Siegel, a long-time proponent of comprehensive performance audits, sees
the ad as a way to get the attention of legislators, and even embarrass
them if need be.
"My vision for talk radio has always been to inspire citizens to get
involved in holding their government accountable," Siegel said. "This
state needs performance audits and Siegels Soldiers met the challenge
to send that message loud and clear to legislators."
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"