Contact: Jason Mercier, Budget Research Analyst (360) 956-3482
Washingtonians to work until July 20 for
cost of government
The average Washingtonian will work until July 20 to pay for the cost of
government, nine days longer than the average American. Overall, Americans
will work nearly five days longer than last year to pay for governments
increasing expenses. In total, Washingtonians will work for 202 days in
2003 to pay for the cost of government.
Cost of Government Day (COGD), as calculated annually by the
D.C.-based Americans for Tax Reform (ATR), arrives July 20 for Washington
this year, nine days later than the national COGD of July
11.
ATR defines Cost of Government Day as "the date of the
calendar year on which the average American worker has earned enough gross
income to pay off his or her share of spending and regulatory burdens imposed
by all levels of government, federal, state and local."
Though still ranking near the bottom nationally, Washington
did improve from 49th to 45th place. Washingtons slight COGD ranking
improvement is likely due to the states newfound budget discipline
this past year. While COGD does come later this year, some states increased
their burden faster than Washington. The overall driver of the later 2003
date is due in part to federal spending increases for the war in Iraq, new
corporate regulations and the federal bailout of the states.
The lowest COGD is found in Alaska where workers labored 168
days in 2003 to pay for governments expenses (June 17). Coming in
last, once again, is Connecticut, where 216 days of labor is required (August
3).
"Without our recent no-new-taxes budget, the cost we
Washingtonians pay to support government would be even worse," said
Jason Mercier, budget analyst for the Evergreen Freedom Foundation. "There
is absolutely no reason why citizens should have to work more than half
the year to shoulder the cost of government."
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"