Marysville union declares EFF an "evil
band of zealots"
EFF staff
make plans to be "zealous" in Marysville MARYSVILLE -- In a rather surprising attempt to sway the
minds of teachers who are walking the picket lines in Marysville, the Marysville
Education Association has published an article declaring the Evergreen Freedom
Foundation an "evil band of zealots."
Foundation staff, startled and amused by the unions
newest moniker for EFF, wondered what sorts of things an evil band of zealots
would do. Concluding that the union would be sufficiently horrified if EFF
staff traveled to Marysville Monday morning to hand out information about
school financing and district budgets, a few Foundation staff have decided
to do just that.
"We didnt want to disappoint the union, so we thought
we should do something zealous," said Marsha Richards, EFF Communications
Director. "We plan to cover up our horns and go to Marysville to support
a student-organized press conference, where well hand out important
information about school funding."
Students have yet to choose a location for their press conference,
which they announced during a visit with Governor Locke in Olympia. It is
scheduled for 10:00 a.m. Monday morning in Marysville. EFF will publish
the location when it is confirmed by organizers.
"The fact is, students want to be back in the classroom
learning," said Richards. "We dont blame them. They love
their teachers, but the Marysville strike is not only illegal, its
harmful to students."
The Foundation encourages media and concerned citizens to
attend the student press conference.
"Students are asking probing and legitimate questions,
and up until now most of the information they have received comes from strike
supporters," said Richards. "We believe they should be able to
form opinions and make decisions based on all the facts."
Contact: Marsha
Richards | Communications Director | 360.956.3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"