EFF's Election Report ·
Gonzales Letter ·
Welfare Reform ·
Boeing Contract ·
Budget & Taxes ·
Business Climate ·
K-12 Fact Sheet ·
EFF Health Study ·
Paycheck Protection ·
Transportation ·
Unemployment Ins. ·
Receive Updates ·
Bookmark EFF ·
Contribute ·
EFF in the News ·
How Can I Help? ·
Join EFF ·
Media Center ·
|
PRESS RELEASE December 18, 2003 Governor abandons "Priorities of Government" Supplemental budget proposal would double state deficitOLYMPIA – Governor Gary Locke abandoned the "Priorities of Government" budget model today with a proposed $193 million supplemental budget increase. If adopted, his proposal will nearly double the state deficit to $453 million this biennium, and the carry-forward costs will contribute to a multi-billion dollar deficit in the 2005-07 biennium. "If Governor Locke is serious about setting priorities, he won't drain one-time emergency reserves to increase spending for ongoing programs," said Bob Williams, president of the Olympia-based Evergreen Freedom Foundation. "The governor's proposal is unsustainable and abandons the promises he made to taxpayers last year." The governor's proposal eliminates the state's emergency reserve fund, and reduces the state's general reserve fund to less than one percent of state expenditures. Analysts recommend a five-percent reserve. For the governor to adhere to his Priorities of Government model, his supplemental budget would have to be revenue-neutral this year. This is because the state has no new money to spend in a tough economy. Additional spending that the governor feels is necessary would need to be balanced by corresponding spending cuts elsewhere. "The governor received national acclaim earlier this year for embracing priority-based budgeting," said Williams. "It's now up to the legislature to exercise true leadership and budget responsibly when they consider this proposal in January." Facts from the governor's balance sheet (dollars in millions): Current Budget (2003-05) Governor's Supplemental Budget Contact: Jason Mercier | Budget Research Analyst | 360.956.3482
|
1 Part Honesty; 2 Parts Arrogance At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question: "Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?" - Rep. Jim McIntire (D - 46) Despite the arrogance of some state officials, Washington's constitution is clear: "All political power is inherent in the people..." |
