OLYMPIAThe Evergreen Freedom Foundation has obtained details of the
state's agreement with Boeing, which the state has tried to keep secret. The
agreement confirms that a $3.2 billion tax break and long-needed unemployment
insurance reforms were not enough to convince Boeing to continue doing business
in our state.
Some of the "extras" in the contract include:
Seven full-time employees hired by the state (with Boeing's approval) to
expedite the company's permitting requests; coordinate workforce training;
work on the company's transportation needs; provide advice and consulting
on state tax policy, pursue and apply for grants, coordinate relations between
the company and state and local governments, etc.
Special exemptions from sales, use and property taxes.
Rate freezes for water, sewer, wastewater treatment and solid waste services.
Favorable treatment in environmental impact analyses.
State payment and management for all recruitment, screening and training
of the workforce needed for Boeing's 7E7 project.
A state-bought (or built) facility to serve as Boeing's Employment Resource
Center, with all costs associated with operation, maintenance and repair of
the facility paid for by the state.
A provision instructing all parties with access to "withhold or redact"
all details of the agreement "to the fullest extent permitted by law."
"Our state's business climate is so bad that despite a highly publicized
$3 billion tax break and unemployment insurance reforms, the governor had to
cut a special deal and hire seven full-time employees to run interference for
Boeing," said Bob Williams, EFF's president. "Now what about all
the other businesses that are barely surviving under Washington's onerous tax,
regulatory and permitting policies? Who will run interference for them and
the families they employ?"
Governor Locke has stated his special agreement with Boeing is responsible
for safeguarding 200,000 state jobs.
"Boeing jobs are crucial to our state, but so are the others that have
not been afforded the governor's special protection," said Williams. "If
the Tumwater Brewery had enjoyed even a few of the provisions granted to Boeing,
it would still be here. That's 400 jobs! We've lost more than 90,000 manufacturing
jobs under Locke's administration."
EFF contends that the state's deal with Boeing is unconstitutional because
it gives the company special treatment not afforded to other businesses.
"This is inequality under the law," said Williams. "We're
not saying the legitimate reforms granted to Boeing should be undone. We're
saying ease the burden on other businesses as well. Businesses don't need corporate
welfare at the expense of taxpayers, they need freedom to compete."
Contact: Marsha
Richards | Communications Director | 360.956.3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"