Governor Locke has asked the legislature to approve the contract and funding
package for his recent deal with Boeing, including a new shift in $6 million
the governor now wants from the 2003-05 Capital Budget instead of the 2005-07
Capital Budget. Yet he still withholds valuable information from legislators
that they must have before proceedinginformation related to whether
or not the contract is legal in its entirety.
The two most important Exhibits related to this are still under lock and
key, yet by law, they should have been available to everyone well before
now. Still missing 46 days after the contract was signed are the following
documents:
1. A copy of the "Governor's Executive Order or clear directive,"
which is required by Section 7.3 of the contract. This executive order/directive
details the duties of the Workforce Development Coordinator (WDC) and the
responsibilities of state agencies in assisting the WDC. This was required
by the contract to be issued "concurrently with the execution"
of the Agreement. (Section 7.3).
2. Exhibit F: Copies of whatever authorizing (statutory) actions are required
to satisfy the commitments to the contract. The document sent was blanknot
redacted, but blank.
3. Exhibit G: Copies of the opinions of counsel related to whether or not
the elements of the contract are legal. The document sent was blanknot
redacted.
4. A copy of Schedule 1: Site application questionnaire for Project Olympus.
The document sent was blank, not redacted.
5. A copy of Schedule 2: Project Olympus Legal Questionnaire Washington
State Response. The document sent was blank, not redacted.
6. Restatement of commitments dated November 10, 2003. The document sent
was blank, not redacted.
After learning that the state had a separate contract with a consultant
regarding the Boeing site selection, on January 21 EFF requested a copy
of the contract and that consultant's report. On January 23, CTED denied
that the state had such a contract. Despite providing CTED with the name
and details of that Boeing consultant on January 28, CTED still has not
provided a copy of the contract (nor even acknowledged the additional details
we provided regarding the contract). A Seattle
Times
January 31, 2003 story reported that the state paid $715,000 to consultants
from Deloitte & Touche to assist the state in securing the Boeing 7E7.
EFF is now considering legal action against both the governor and Ms. Choe
in order to bring about full disclosure of the Boeing agreement and relevant
documents.
Contact: Jason
Mercier | Budget Research Analyst | 360.956.3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"