Supplemental budget pushes state spending
$409 million past forecasted revenue
OLYMPIA Legislators approved a $145 million spending
increase in the states operating budget tonight. Including changes made
in tax policy this session, the state will spend $409 million more than it
expects to collect this biennium. This means the state will face a $1 billion
(or more) deficit heading into the 2005-07 budget cycle.
Governor Lockes Priorities of Government budget consultant, Peter Hutchinson
of the Minnesota-based Public
Strategies Group, warned last year that the states commitment to
the new priority-based budget model would be tested by its approach to the
supplemental budget this year. Adhering to the model would have required a
revenue-neutral budget, with new spending offset by decreases in other areas.
Priority-based budgeting requires that lawmakers identify governments
core functions and prioritize all spending within forecasted revenue. Even
before todays supplemental budget increases were approved, the state
was on track to spend more than forecasted revenue. The new spending will increase
the deficit for the next biennium.
This is clearly an election year budget, said Bob Williams, EFFs
president. Instead of addressing the relatively small deficit we had
coming into the session, legislators made the deficit bigger and guaranteed
trouble for taxpayers in 2005.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"