Search EFFWA Site:

EFF's Election Report ·  
Gonzales Letter ·  
Welfare Reform ·  
Boeing Contract ·  
Budget & Taxes ·  
Business Climate ·  
K-12 Fact Sheet ·  
EFF Health Study ·  
Paycheck Protection ·  
Transportation ·  
Unemployment Ins. ·  

Receive Updates ·  
Bookmark EFF ·  
Contribute ·  
EFF in the News ·  
How Can I Help? ·  
Join EFF ·  
Media Center ·  

PRESS RELEASE

March 11, 2004

Supplemental budget pushes state spending $409 million past forecasted revenue

OLYMPIA – Legislators approved a $145 million spending increase in the state’s operating budget tonight. Including changes made in tax policy this session, the state will spend $409 million more than it expects to collect this biennium. This means the state will face a $1 billion (or more) deficit heading into the 2005-07 budget cycle.

Governor Locke’s Priorities of Government budget consultant, Peter Hutchinson of the Minnesota-based Public Strategies Group, warned last year that the state’s commitment to the new priority-based budget model would be tested by its approach to the supplemental budget this year. Adhering to the model would have required a revenue-neutral budget, with new spending offset by decreases in other areas.

State budget experts echoed these concerns in December when they predicted the state would face a $3.1 billion deficit or enjoy a $380 million surplus in 2009 depending on how legislators approached the budget.

Priority-based budgeting requires that lawmakers identify government’s core functions and prioritize all spending within forecasted revenue. Even before today’s supplemental budget increases were approved, the state was on track to spend more than forecasted revenue. The new spending will increase the deficit for the next biennium.

“This is clearly an election year budget,” said Bob Williams, EFF’s president. “Instead of addressing the relatively small deficit we had coming into the session, legislators made the deficit bigger and guaranteed trouble for taxpayers in 2005.”

2004 Supplemental Budget Balance Sheet (Dollars in Millions)*

2003-05 forecasted revenue:
$22,897.3
Session tax policy
<$80>
Spending level
$23,226.2
Difference
<$408.9>

*As of 3/10/04 8:28 p.m. Conference Report.

Contact: Jason Mercier | Budget Research Analyst | 360.956.3482


Evergreen Freedom Foundation
P.O. Box 552, Olympia, WA 98507
Phone: (360) 956-3482, Fax: (360) 352-1874
Email: effwa@effwa.org


Election Reform


Grassroots Washington

Performance Audit Pledge
View pledge results

Health Plan 4 Life

Ten-Minute Citizen

WashingtonVotes.org

ChoosingLiberty.org

1 Part Honesty; 2 Parts Arrogance

At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:

"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"

- Rep. Jim McIntire (D - 46)
(360) 786-7886

Despite the arrogance of some state officials, Washington's constitution is clear: "All political power is inherent in the people..."

Court of Appeals Ruling AG's WEA Appeal What is the WEA Hiding? Determining Government's Core Functions Priorities of Government Stewardship Series School Directors' Handbook Professional Choices For WA Educators Congressional Testimony (6/20/02) Agency Rule Change Request Social Security Calculator Tax Dividend Calculator Public Records Requests