WA Supreme Court heard appeal on forced political participation
and teachers' rights
OLYMPIA On Thursday, May 27, the Washington Supreme Court
heard oral arguments in an appeal of the 2003 Court of Appeals ruling declaring
the state law prohibiting unauthorized use of non-member union fees for politics
as unconstitutional.
The decision negated part of campaign finance Initiative 134, which was
approved by 72 percent of Washington's voters in 1992.
The Washington Education Association (WEA) was sued by the state Attorney
General (AG) and found guilty in July 2001 of willfully violating RCW 42.17.760,
which prohibits the union from using fees taken from non-member teachers
to advance political causes without permission from those teachers. The
WEA was ordered to pay $570,000 in fines and penalties and return nearly
$200,000 to teachers.
Since the state was unable to request refunds for the 5,000 to 8,000 eligible
teachers, the Evergreen Freedom Foundation (EFF) and the National Right
to Work Foundation pursued a refund for them in a separate class action
lawsuit.
The WEA appealed rulings in both cases. Attorneys for the WEA argued that
money taken from teachers' paychecks belongs to the union and any attempts
to limit their unauthorized use of teachers' money is an abridgement of
the union's free speech rights.
By contrast, the Attorney General's office focused on the free speech rights
of teachers, arguing that the union's practice of spending teachers' money
on politics without their consent amounts to "forced political speech."
In a 2-1 ruling June
24, 2003, Washington's Court of Appeals ruled that the law violated
the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, saying the First Amendment
free speech rights of union official supercedes the First Amendment free
speech rights of teachers.
Bob Williams, president of the Evergreen Freedom Foundation, called the
Court of Appeals ruling, "a stunning blow to teachers and other union
workers."
"The WEA actually argued in court that it has no fiduciary duty'
to its members. This is an outrageous claim that we hope all teachers will
take note of," Williams said.
The Evergreen Freedom Foundation, a long-time advocate of free speech and
fair elections, filed the original complaint against the WEA that sparked
the Attorney
General's case.
The consolidated case:
Supreme Court No. 74268-5 - State Ex Rel Public Disclosure Comm. v. Washington
Education Assoc.
Court of Appeals No. 28264-0-II
Supreme Court No. 74316-9 - Gary Davenport, et al., v. Washington State
Education Association
Court of Appeals No. 28375-1-II
Oral arguments heard:
May 27th, 8:45-9:45 am
RCW 42.17.760 - Agency shop fees as contributions.
A labor organization may not use agency shop fees paid by an individual
who is not a member of the organization to make contributions or expenditures
to influence an election or to operate a political committee, unless affirmatively
authorized by the individual.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"