7E7 public records contradict state's
declarations filed under penalty of perjury Public records act violated by not releasing documents until July
OLYMPIA Last week the Evergreen Freedom Foundation
(EFF) received public records from the state's 7E7 Project Office that directly
contradict previous legal declarations from that office declarations
filed under penalty of perjury related to EFF's public records lawsuit.
Thurston County Superior Court Judge Christine Pomeroy ruled on March
26, 2004, that EFF did not have the right to unfettered access to public
documents related to the Boeing/State of Washington 7E7 agreement. On
August 23, EFF filed its appeal
brief and motion to
supplement the court record.
Responding to EFF's December 19th request for the Boeing/State of Washington
agreement, the 7E7 Project Office officials claimed in multiple legal declarations
on February 25, 2004, that they did not have in their possession the authorizing
resolutions in Exhibit F of the contract. This is the portion that listed
the authority of various government entities to engage in certain contract
provisions. Officials said they would provide Exhibit F documents to EFF
as soon as they had them.
But from other contract
provisions, EFF was certain the 7E7 office already had those documents,
and EFF said so. The state's denial was swift.
7E7 Project Coordinator Robin Pollard, in her February 25, 2004, court
declaration stated: "It is difficult to understand why EFF complains
that CTED or the Project Office have not complied with the public records
act when we have disclosed records ready for disclosure, and cannot disclose
records we do not have or do not exist."
Former 7E7 Project Director Martha Choe also stated in her February 25,
2004, court declaration:
"CTED and my office do not yet have copies of these documents, but
will be happy to provide them to EFF, or any other requestor, once it receives
them."
Also during this time period, Director Choe traveled to editorial boards
to explain how EFF was harassing the 7E7 Office, asking for records she
said her office had already provided or did not exist.
Then, records obtained by EFF on August
18, 2004, provide proof that the state did have in its possession copies
of at least two of the authorizing
resolutions requested by EFFeven at the time state officials were
declaring under penalty of perjury they did not.
"A simple public records request from EFF has turned into a full-fledged
court battle over what the public has a right to know," said Jason
Mercier, EFF budget analyst. "When state officials are doing the public's
business using the public's money, their obligation is to be transparent.
No state official should feel free to withhold public records."
Additional Information
Public records time line for Exhibit F
December 19, 2003 - EFF requests copy of Boeing contract (request covered
any documents responsive to Exhibit F)
February 25, 2004 - 7E7 Project Office officials (Choe,
Krier, Pollard,
State) file declarations
under penalty of perjury claiming that no documents responsive to Exhibit
F exist but once that office did have responsive documents it would turn
them over to EFF.
May 13, 2004 - EFF
again requests copies of documents responsive to Exhibit F (among other
documents).
July 2, 2004 - Robin
Pollard responds: "At this time, we have not received any further authorizing
resolutions and therefore do not have any records responsive to this
part of your request." However, among other documents provided
on July 2 were internal 7E7 checklists which documented that the state
did in fact have in its possession copies of the authorizing resolutions
requested by EFF.
July 9, 2004 - EFF informs
7E7 Project Office that internal 7E7 checklists provided on July 2, 2004
indicated the state has in its possession documents responsive to Exhibit
F.
July 15, 2004 - Robin
Pollard responds: "You are correct; the authorizing government
resolutions have not previously been sent. Thank you for bringing this oversight
to our attention; we had intended that those would be part of the
prior mailing to Mr. Mercier. Enclosed are copies of all local government
authorizing resolutions that we have received to date."
August 3, 2004 - EFF sends follow up records request for all copies of
the 7E7 Project Office's Boeing agreement checklists to determine the earliest
date the state had in its possession documents responsive to Exhibit F.
August 18, 2004 -
State's response provided documents indicating that at the time of the February
25, 2004 declarations to the court in EFF's public records lawsuit, the
state had in its possession at least two
of the authorizing resolutions requested.
August 23, 2004 - EFF files motion
to supplement the court record to reflect the new records developments.
Contact: Jason Mercier
| Budget Research Analyst | 360.956.3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"