OLYMPIAThe Evergreen Freedom Foundation (EFF) filed
a complaint today with the Washington State Attorney Generals Office,
notifying the AG of multiple campaign finance violations by the Washington
State Labor Council, AFL-CIO.
EFF, a long-time advocate of free speech and fair elections, alleges the
Washington State Labor Council (WSLC) has committed numerous violations
of state campaign finance laws and is operating as an illegal, unregistered
political action committee. The complaint was filed after receiving numerous
reports of the WSLCs undisclosed political activities.
The Citizens Action complaint gives Attorney General
Christine Gregoire 45 days to take action or allow EFF to file a lawsuit
against the labor council on behalf of the state.
Among the violations listed, the WSLC failed to disclose thousands of dollars
in political expenditures, exceeded campaign contribution limits, used public
funds for political expenditures and failed to register and report as a
political committee.
EFFs complaint calls on Attorney General Gregoire to fully investigate
and prosecute the WSLC for violating campaign finance laws.
AFL-CIO President John Sweeney once said that [t]ransparency,
accountability, and full and accurate disclosure should be the central goals
of financial regulation, and we believe the WSLC should live up to
that standard, said Bob Williams, president of EFF.
EFF is filing this complaint one day before the WSLC Labor Neighbor
effort, which is just one example of the WSLCs political activism,
said Williams. The WSLC is committing its resources to mobilizing
union members, leaders and staffers in a massive door-to-door effort to
oppose President Bush and Washington state Republican candidates.
Based on this and hundreds of other examples, the WSLC acts as a
political organization and should be required to register and report as
such, says Williams.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"