OLYMPIA In the fable of old, the Emperor was naked.
Ill admit to seeing a tad bit of cloth.
My modern-day Emperor is the education establishment. They and our governor
are having a party right now to celebrate "increases" in student
achievement in our state as measured by the dreaded Washington Assessment
of Student Learning (WASL) scores compared against the federal No Child
Left Behind Act standards. They say more students than ever have moved into
the "proficient" category.
But several problems exist with these "increases," the first
being the definition of proficiency. In 10th grade, for example, a student
must get only 39 points of a possible 64 in math (61%) to be declared proficient.
Only 42.5% of the students hit that benchmark or above. In 10th grade reading,
a student must get only 31 of 52 possible points (60%) to be declared proficient.
Seventy percent of students are proficient at the 60% benchmark. This is
the best score of the 10th grade results.
The Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction noted that they
decreased the "proficiency cut score" by one point, altering the
baseline. The changes in "cut scores" could push student test
scores up to 12 percent higher than last year, without those students actually
knowing one more iota of information. Requirements for obtaining Level 2
Basic status and Level 4 Advanced status were also lowered.
Comparisons between achievement scores for this year and last are impossible
unless very detailed information for each measured subgroup is obtained
school-by-school. This is because requirements for several pools of test
takers were changed as well. We think some of the changes are fine, but
it does alter the overall outcome. The education establishment makes data
collection very hard. (We are still waiting for information we requested
a year ago.)
So, are children making real gains in acquiring necessary knowledge and
skills? We dont know. But if they are making progress, it is not very
much, except maybe in the area of reading (depending on the analysis of
subgroup results). Any gain is important, but this one is seriously oversold.
Meanwhile, one-third of students drop out between 9th and 12th grade, and
one-third of our students are not qualified to enter the workforce after
they graduate from high school. Employers are bemoaning the lack of qualified
employees and our higher education institutions are putting more and more
freshman students into remedial high school courses. And by 2010, America
will have lost its edge in math, science, engineering, and technology; mostly
because our curriculum in math and science lacks academic integrity and
rigor, and because many teachers lack academic credentials in those fields.
Todays results show that 56% of all fourth graders do not meet the
standards in the combined subjects of reading, writing and math. The percentage
of 7th graders who do not meet the combined standards is 64%. For 10th graders
it is 61%. These alarming numbers mean we must have far faster results,
and the education establishments unwillingness to adopt the necessary
best practices to make this happen is unacceptable.
Perhaps the real reason for the party-like atmosphere is the education
bureaucracys success in making this information so hard to understand
and so difficult to check out that few citizens, parents and reporters will
even attempt it.
Contact: Marsha
Richards | Education Reform Center Director | 360.956.3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"