OLYMPIASen. Pam Roach (R-Auburn) has drafted a performance
audit bill reflecting 100 percent of the model language the Evergreen Freedom
Foundation (EFF) submitted to legislators in the form of a performance
audit pledge last year. Fifty-three members of the House (including
Speaker Frank Chopp) and 17 members of the Senate signed EFF's performance
audit pledge. This means there should be no obstacles to a companion bill
being introduced in the House.
"The legislature appears poised to finally adopt independent and comprehensive
performance audits of state government," said Jason Mercier, budget
research analyst for EFF. "We would like to thank Sen. Roach and all
the performance audit pledge signers for their commitment to this type of
accountability to citizens."
Performance reviews in Texas have identified $16 billion in potential
savings since being authorized in 1991 and California's recent performance
review identified $32 billion in potential savings that could
be assumed over a five-year period.
Pledge signers in the Senate include: Senators Benson, Benton, Carrell,
Delvin, Esser, Honeyford, Kastama, McCaslin, Mulliken, Parlette, Rasmussen,
Roach, Schoesler, Sheldon, Stevens, Swecker
and Zarelli.
EFF sent each of the performance audit pledge signers a letter
today thanking them for their support and offering the Foundation's assistance
if needed. Although a performance audit initiative is being proposed by
another organization, EFF believes the legislature should have a final crack
at adopting this needed reform.
"If legislators decide not to honor their pledge, the people will
have an insurance policy in the proposed performance audit initiative,"
said Mercier.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"