OLYMPIAAs early as tomorrow, the House may vote on a
bill to authorize performance audits of state government. As currently drafted,
however, that bill (HB 1064) falls
short of meeting the necessary standards to ensure that performance
audits are independently and comprehensively conducted by the people's state
auditor.
Hoping to seize on the current opportunity, the state auditor's office
has suggested an amendment to HB 1064, which addresses the bill's current
shortcomings. The state auditor's amendment surpasses the language provided
to legislators in the Evergreen Freedom Foundation's performance audit pledge.
Fifty-three Representatives are signers of EFF's performance
audit pledge. The preamble to the EFF
pledge reads in-part:
Whereas the citizens of Washington state realize achieving efficient,
effective and economical operation of state government requires transparency
and accountability for tax dollars spent, I pledge to support independent
comprehensive performance audits of state agencies.
The scope of performance audits should be established by the elected
state auditor, not an unelected group of citizens appointed by the governor
and legislature. The auditor should forward findings to the legislature
each year, and the legislature should, in turn, annually report on the
status of its implementation of the auditor's recommendations.
The state auditor's amendment to HB 1064:
authorizes the state auditor to conduct independent and comprehensive
performance audits and allows the state auditor alone to set the audit
scope;
creates a citizen advisory board to provide input
to the state auditor, but does not grant that board veto
power over audit scopes or areas for review;
requires the state auditor make the final performance audit reports
available to the public and post the reports on the internet (online);
authorizes the state auditor to conduct performance audits of
local governments using local funds if a local government requests such
a review,
requires two one-hundredths of one percent of the state's total
general fund state budget each biennium be set aside to fund the performance
audits initiated by the state auditor (approximately $5 million for the
2005-07 biennium); and
does not sunset the performance audit authorization.
"Legislators should not fear independent and comprehensive performance
audits of state government," said Jason Mercier, budget analyst for
the Evergreen Freedom Foundation. "The elected state auditor should
not have to get permission from an unelected group of citizens in order
to do the job we hired him to do."
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"