OLYMPIADespite the efforts of Rep. Mark Miloscia (D-Federal
Way), Speaker Frank Chopp (D-Seattle), Rep. Mike Armstrong (R-Wenatchee),
and a long list of bi-partisan House members, the House today approved a
bill (74-22) that falls short of granting the state auditor the authorization
to conduct independent and comprehensive performance audits of state government
without having to first gain approval from an unelected citizen board.
U.S. General Accountability Office standards for auditing (often referred
to as "yellow book" standards) require auditors be independent
both in fact and appearance from personal, external, and organizational
impairments to independence. The citizen board as structured in HB
1064 serves as an organizational impairment to independence.
"While the House made some strides today toward meaningful accountability,
changes are still needed to assure truly independent and comprehensive performance
audits are conducted by the state auditor," said Jason Mercier, budget
analyst for the Evergreen Freedom Foundation. "It is up to the Senate
now to make the necessary changes so that a people's initiative is unnecessary."
Though renamed from the "citizen oversight board" to the "citizen
advisory board," the board, not the state auditor, is charged
with establishing the criteria for any performance audits in the bill adopted
today. The state auditor is a non-voting member of the ten person board
and is prohibited from serving as chair.
An amendment
to HB 1064 was offered by Rep. Armstrong to authorize the state auditor
alone be able to determine the scope of any performance audits, but it failed
on a vote of 47-49.
Last year, fifty-three Representatives signed a performance
audit pledge sponsored by the Evergreen Freedom Foundation, which read
in-part: "I pledge to support independent comprehensive performance
audits of state agencies. The scope of performance audits should be established
by the elected state auditor, not an unelected group of citizens appointed
by the governor and legislature."
Though the current role of the board needs changing, HB 1064 as passed
with an amendment by Rep. Kathy Haigh (D-Shelton):
requires the final performance audit reports be made available
to the public and posted on the internet;
authorizes the state auditor to conduct performance audits of
local governments using local funds if a local government requests such
a review;
requires two one-hundredths of one percent of the state's total
general fund state budget each biennium be set aside to fund the performance
audits (approximately $5 million for the 2005-07 biennium);
does not sunset the performance audit authorization;
and
establishes an annual agency scorecard system to grade agencies
on their performance.
"The proposed board is well suited to carry out the agency score card
requirements of the bill, but should not be allowed to serve as a
gatekeeper on the types of performance audits the state auditor can do,"
said Mercier. "While we appreciate the hard work of the House in moving
this reform forward, we are hopeful the Senate will be able to change the
role of the board to truly one of advice versus oversight."
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"