OLYMPIASen. Pam Roach (R-Auburn) introduced a new performance
audit bill today (SB
6076) which closely resembles the draft
bill the state auditor's office (SAO) and House Speaker Frank Chopp
(D-Seattle) previously worked on but was never brought to the House floor
for consideration. With today's deadline for bills to be passed out of committee
looming, it is unlikely SB 6076 will meet the deadline. However, with the
full Senate yet to take action on the performance audit bill passed by the
House (ESHB
1064), it is possible Sen. Roach's new performance audit bill could
resurface as a striker amendment to the House bill.
SB 6076 addresses the performance audit values that State Auditor Brian
Sonntag has advocated over the past twelve yearsaudit independence;
citizen, employee and private-sector involvement; and regularly and publicly
reporting the results, making its adoption likely preferable to Sonntag
than the bill passed by the House. It also reflects the provisions of the
Evergreen Freedom Foundation's performance audit
pledge signed by 70 legislators and the state auditor.
The key provisions of SB 6076 include:
The state auditor is clearly authorized to conduct performance
audits and has the discretion of whether or not to contract for those
audits (ESHB 1064 requires the state auditor to contract out any audits);
The state auditor alone establishes the criteria for performance
audits (ESHB 1064 does not allow the state auditor to establish audit
criteria, leaving that power to an unelected political board);
The state auditor is responsible for performance audits of state
government (ESHB 1064 places an unelected political board on equal footing
with the state auditor, in effect creating a veto over the state auditor
should disagreement exist);
An eight member "citizen accountability advisory board"
is created with all members being eligible to serve as chair and able
to vote (ESHB 1064 creates a ten member political board of which the state
auditor is a non-voting member and prohibited from serving as chair);
The "citizen accountability advisory board" is charged
with establishing an agency performance grading system with the results
of those scorecards annually reported to the public (ESHB 1064 also has
this provision);
The state auditor is authorized to conduct performance audits
of transportation related agencies (ESHB 1064 leaves this power to a political
board);
The state auditor is authorized to conduct performance audits
of local government using local funds if requested by the local legislative
authority (ESHB 1064 also has this provision); and
Funding for these performance audits is required to be equal two
one-hundredths of one percent of each biennium's general fund state operating
budget [approximately $5 million for 2005-07] (ESHB 1064 also has this
provision).
"Sen. Roach's new proposal addresses each of the problems identified
in the House bill and meets the expectations the state auditor laid out
in his original draft bill," said Jason Mercier, budget analyst for
the Evergreen Freedom Foundation. "It will be interesting to see if
the Senate seizes the opportunity to pass truly independent and comprehensive
performance audits or if that duty will be left to an initiative to the
people."
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"