State Auditor releases "2004 Statewide
Accountability Report"
41 findings issued against state agencies
OLYMPIAToday State Auditor Brian Sonntag released the
2004
Statewide Accountability Report highlighting 41 audit findings issued
against state agencies. Of the 41 audit findings, 23 are repeat findings
from last year's audit. An additional 16 management letters (problems identified
that don't rise to the level of a finding) were issued to agencies (including
7 regarding audit findings from last year that have not been resolved).
In addition to the 41 audit findings, the state auditor highlighted the
following "audit
challenges":
In addition to refusing to provide electronic records, agencies
are using other methods to cause delays in our audits or to require us
to spend unnecessary audit resources to accomplish our audit objectives
and to meet state and federal auditing requirements.
Some agencies ask us to justify why we want information. In
some cases, they have denied us the information, if they are not satisfied
with our responses.
Some agencies indicate they are too busy to be audited and
ask for a delay.
The 41 audit findings consisted of 19 findings for Social and Health Services;
five findings for Labor and Industries; four findings for Community Trade
and Economic Development; two findings each for Military and Transportation;
and one finding each for Corrections, Employment Security, Financial Management,
Health, Personnel, Retirement Systems, Superintendent of Public Instruction,
Veterans Affairs, and Volunteer Firefighters and Reserves Officers.
Among the auditor's findings:
Department of Retirement Systems is withholding approximately
$1.1 million in accounts from beneficiaries of individuals who have been
deceased for up to 40 years;
Department of Employment Security (ESD) paid at least $142,847
in unemployment insurance benefits to ineligible individuals. ESD also
paid more than $185,000 in benefits to individuals in their first week
of unemployment in violation of state law (repeat finding);
Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) does not have
adequate controls over payments made to child care providers resulting
in $2.2 million in overpayments (repeat finding);
DSHS wrote-off (forgave) $904,497 in required repayment from child
care providers (overpayments) without proper documentation;
DSHS does not adequately ensure costs are properly charged to
state and federal funds leading to the questioning of more than $226 million
in costs (repeat finding);
DSHS does not perform adequate background checks on child care
providers (repeat finding);
Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction did not comply
with state and federal requirements when contracting for services, resulting
in $2,128,600 in questionable contracts;
Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) did not provide evidence
it complied with state bid laws when making more than $7.2 million in
technology service purchases (repeat finding);
L&I destroyed 30 percent of its inventory records prior to
the approved destruction date (repeat finding);
L&I does not have adequate controls in place to safeguard
its pension payment system (the system processes more than $477 million
in benefits a year);
L&I was unable to reconcile more than $5.5 million in employer
workers' compensation payments in its financial systems (repeat finding);
L&I cannot account for more than $9 million in employer workers'
compensation payments that were recorded as being received but not deposited
(repeat finding);
Department of Corrections does not have adequate controls over
its pharmacy inventory to detect or prevent theft or loss of drugs;
Department of Transportation (DOT) made travel payment to employees
in excess of written contract amounts (repeat finding); and
DOT does not have adequate controls over ticket sales and revenue
collection for state ferries (repeat finding; finding dates back to
1986).
Earlier this year the state auditor was forced to "disclaim"
the entire audit of the state's $6.1
billion Medicaid program due to obstruction of the audit by DSHS. According
to the state auditor: "Disclaim' is a term used in auditing standards
that means we cannot conclude, based on documentation and other evidence
we were provided, whether all of these costs were allowable or whether all
clients were eligible for services given to them and all providers were
eligible for payments made to them."
"More troubling than there being 41 audit findings this year is the
fact that 23 of them are repeat findings from last year," said Jason
Mercier, budget analyst for the Evergreen Freedom Foundation. "State
law requires audit correction to occur; obviously someone isn't doing their
job since the problem continues to persist year after year. Take the ferries
for example, when is someone going to be held accountable for the same audit
finding spanning nearly two decades?"
"Those agencies refusing to cooperate with the state auditor must
be held accountable," said Mercier. "Lawmakers could easily demonstrate
their commitment to government transparency by making an example of agencies
that obstruct the people's elected state auditor."
"The problems identified in this audit have nothing to do with how
efficient agencies are, rather they are examples of violations of law. Imagine
the type of savings that could be realized by auditing the actual performance
of agency programs," said Mercier. "It is past time to allow the
state auditor to conduct truly independent and comprehensive performance
audits of state government."
Contact: Jason Mercier
| Budget Research Analyst | 360.956.3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"