Gregoire plays budget shell games to
avoid vote of the people
OLYMPIAToday Governor Christine Gregoire released a
self-proclaimed "unsustainable budget." Despite saying she "produced
a no-new taxes budget," Gregoire requests tax increases of $203 million
(cigarette and partial reinstatement of the estate tax previously thrown
out by the state Supreme Court). Not mentioned at her press conference are
her plans to increase spending for the current budget by $219 million. This
$219 million 2005 spending increase combined with her 2005-07 budget request
means Gregoire hopes to increase state spending by $2.6 billion or more
than three times the rate of inflation.
To reach her record spending level of $25.8 billion, however, the governor
raises the I-601 voter-approved spending limit by $810 million. She does
this by playing budget shell games with her 2005 supplemental budget request
and by shifting $244 million from dedicated accounts to the general fund
for the 2005-07 budget. By artificially raising the I-601 spending limit,
the governor is denying the people their right under the law to approve
any taxes and expenditures in excess of the I-601 spending limit.
"The governor said 'we must change the culture of state government,'
but her budget is a return to the tax-and-spend habits of the early 1990s,"
said Bob Williams, president of the Evergreen Freedom Foundation. "This
budget clearly shows that the governor has abandoned former Governor Locke's
priority of government (POG) model in order to return to business as usual."
Gregoire's budget would leave an ending fund balance of $203 million (the
exact size of her tax increases). This amounts to a budget reserve of less
than one percent to deal with any unforeseen emergencies, such as another
earthquake or incident at Mt. St. Helens.
The governor's $203 million in tax increases are earmarked to fund Initiatives
728 and 732. Ironically, these measures were approved by the voters in 2000
under the incorrect
statements of proponents who indicated that these measures would not
require a tax increase or harm the state's budget. Last year voters defeated
I-884 by a margin of 2-1 when asked to raise taxes to fund the provisions
of 728 and 732.
Contact: Jason Mercier
| Budget Research Analyst | 360.956.3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"