Search EFFWA Site:

EFF's Election Report ·  
Gonzales Letter ·  
Welfare Reform ·  
Boeing Contract ·  
Budget & Taxes ·  
Business Climate ·  
K-12 Fact Sheet ·  
EFF Health Study ·  
Paycheck Protection ·  
Transportation ·  
Unemployment Ins. ·  

Receive Updates ·  
Bookmark EFF ·  
Contribute ·  
EFF in the News ·  
How Can I Help? ·  
Join EFF ·  
Media Center ·  

STUDIES

Medical Savings Accounts Study
How Are Individual Companies Applying the MSA Concepts?

First, it is important to note that the organizations studied use the MSA concept in various ways; only two organizations use the MSA concept in the same way. The Valley Surgical Group located in Phoenix and The Golden Rule Insurance Company in Indianapolis provide health benefits for their employees under nearly identical MSA programs. As will be noted shortly, the Valley Surgical Group insures its employees under a Golden Rule small group MSA plan. This explains the similarities in their MSA program operation and benefits.

Unless otherwise specified in the following descriptions, the MSA component of these plans is funded with money included in gross income for federal income tax purposes, commonly called post tax or after tax dollars.

The employers selected for this evaluation are:

  1. Golden Rule Insurance Company, IN
  2. Valley Surgical Group, AZ
  3. Morris County Hospital, KS
  4. Dominion Resources, Inc., VA
  5. Forbes, Inc. New York, NY
  6. Progress Sharing Company (Spurwink School), Maine
  7. Quaker Oats Company, Chicago, IL
  8. Windham Hospital Health Savings Plan, Willimantic, CT

The first five employer provided health plans are more characteristic of a complete MSA model. The last three, though lacking features common to MSA models, reflect innovative approaches to influencing demand and managing health benefits.

The following presents an overview of each plan:

Previous  |   Table of Contents  |   Next


Evergreen Freedom Foundation
P.O. Box 552, Olympia, WA 98507
Phone: (360) 956-3482, Fax: (360) 352-1874
Email: effwa@effwa.org


Election Reform


Grassroots Washington

Performance Audit Pledge
View pledge results

Health Plan 4 Life

Ten-Minute Citizen

WashingtonVotes.org

ChoosingLiberty.org

1 Part Honesty; 2 Parts Arrogance

At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:

"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"

- Rep. Jim McIntire (D - 46)
(360) 786-7886

Despite the arrogance of some state officials, Washington's constitution is clear: "All political power is inherent in the people..."

Court of Appeals Ruling AG's WEA Appeal What is the WEA Hiding? Determining Government's Core Functions Priorities of Government Stewardship Series School Directors' Handbook Professional Choices For WA Educators Congressional Testimony (6/20/02) Agency Rule Change Request Social Security Calculator Tax Dividend Calculator Public Records Requests