The Medical Savings Account Program Model For Employers II. High Deductible (Catastrophic) Medical Insurance
High deductible medical insurance is the second piece of risk financing for insured or self-insured employers. Self-insured employers who choose to retain the 100% coverage that exceeds the annual deposit of the MSA (deductible or threshold) need to establish risk retention limits expressed as occurrence and excess aggregate amounts. This coverage can be provided and administered under various methods and strategies:
Self-insurance
Excess risk insurance with a re-insurance company
Excess risk agreements with a health insurer
Negotiated agreements with a health provider organization (HMO, PPO)
Agreements with a third party administrator, and/or
Agreements for administrative services only
Self-insured employers should use qualified brokers, excess risk specialists, and health actuarial consultants to determine the actuarial criteria for both the MSA contributions and reserve required for retention or payments required for excess risk coverage. They will need specific historic and prospective census and age data, two years detailed experience and claims data, historical premiums paid for the covered population, and detailed current plan descriptions.
Insured employers who choose to shift the risk for 100% coverage above the MSA contributions need to, purchase coverage at levels no less than current benefit levels. This coverage can be provided by:
Purchase of higher deductible single and family health insurance plans
Negotiated arrangements with a health provider organization (HMO, PPO)
Both insured and self-insured employers should offer employees benefit packages which are similar and warrant no greater maximum out-of-pocket exposure than provided by the previous employee plan.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"