Creep, beep, and crawl. Unfortunately, those words are now a regular part
of our vocabulary when it comes to transportation. Policymakers at the state
and federal level have allowed an unwieldy bureaucracy to stymie innovative
solutions to get us off the road sooner and allow us to spend more time
with our families. EFF thinks outside of the box when it comes to transportation
policy. We advocate equitable funding solutions and maximizing private sector
involvement in the delivery of transportation services.
Unlocking Gridlock Series
This five-part series outlines ways the legislature and the Department of Transportation can fund needed infrastructure improvements without raising taxes
Transportation Solutions:
After the defeat of R-51 Referendum 51 (R-51) was resoundingly defeated in November for
several reasons. Among them: a lack of accountability measures, a well-founded
distrust of government, and the fact that the $7.8 billion tax package
only funded project start-ups, not completion. So now what? Individuals
and businesses are still losing too much time to traffic congestion.
Transportation solutions:
How government can save money while reducing traffic congestion
Before lawmakers ask us for more of our hard-earned money, they must make
sure that every dollar they have now is being spent in the best way possible.
This revealing analysis explores ways government can improve efficiency
and introduce private competition into our transportation system.
Reduce
Congestion Now
A customer-oriented approach to traffic congestion relief
Kemper Freeman Jr. Proposal
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"